Kevin McCarthy: Subject of Counterintelligence Investigation, Part 7

Last Updated on January 1, 2023

Kevin McCarthy Win
Though they misspelled “auction” Bakersfield, CA’s ABC23 got their point across.

Guideline G: Alchohol Consumption:

1.    The Concern. Excessive alcohol consumption often leads to the exercise of questionable judgment or the failure to control impulses, and can raise questions about an individual’s reliability and trustworthiness.

2.    Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:

(a)  alcohol-related incidents away from work, such as driving while under the influence, fighting, child or spouse abuse, disturbing the peace, or other incidents of concern, regardless of the frequency of the individual’s alcohol use or whether the individual has been diagnosed with alcohol use disorder;

(b) alcohol-related incidents at work, such as reporting for work or duty in an intoxicated or impaired condition, drinking on the job, or jeopardizing the welfare and safety of others, regardless of whether the individual is diagnosed with alcohol use disorder;

(c)  habitual or binge consumption of alcohol to the point of impaired judgment, regardless of whether the individual is diagnosed with alcohol use disorder;

(d)  diagnosis by a duly qualified medical or mental health professional (e.g., physician, clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, or licensed clinical social worker) of alcohol use disorder;

(e)  the failure to follow treatment advice once diagnosed;

(f)  alcohol consumption, which is not in accordance with treatment recommendations, after a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder; and

(g) failure to follow any court order regarding alcohol education, evaluation, treatment, or abstinence.

Kevin McCarthy Investigation
via US security clearance guidelines, provided by Green Beret Veteran and Constitutional Attorney Ivan Raiklin

VERDICT: Kevin McCarthy’s counterintelligence risk of Alcohol Consumption is lacking any evidence to support anything other than a favorable determination. No substantive evidence was found at this time nor has come forward that would warrant concern on this adjudicative guideline. Nonetheless, if anyone has proven verifiable evidence to show to the contrary, please provide them to ivan@raiklin.com

This report was originally compiled by Green Beret Veteran and Constitutional Attorney Ivan Raiklin and then censored by Substack.

Follow Ivan Raiklin on GETTR HERE and Telegram HERE

Stay tuned to National File for more of Ivan Raiklin’s expert counter-intelligence investigation into Rep. Kevin McCarthy, as Patriots within Congress take on the uni-party swamp to bring McCarthy’s campaign for Speaker to a screeching halt. 

Read More: Kevin McCarthy: Subject of Counterintelligence Investigation, Part 6 – Financial Considerations